I have long been puzzled with the similarities between synchronicity and quantum entanglement. Of course synchronicity is a 'classical theory' as it seeks for a deterministic approach to reality. Quantum mechanics on the other hand is a probabilistic theory. But both theories are non- local. And the similarities I have found are more than striking. Take a look at the following table for example:
Key words' explanations:
Meaningful coincidence: An instantaneous (non local) connection of a psychic state with one or more physical objects (or events) so that the objects can no longer be adequately described without full mention of the corresponding psychic content.
Quantum entanglement: An instantaneous (non local) connection of two or more physical (quantum-like) objects so that one object can no longer be adequately described without full mention of its counterpart—even if the individual objects are spatially separated.
The psyche and the 'Ψ' wave-function: The similarity is striking. I can clearly see no distinction if some kind of 'emotional' properties are included in the wave-function.
Archetypes: They are the 'standard' ways for the psyche to manifest its self in the same way that operators in QM 'contain' the values to be measured.
The observer effect: It is a well known interpretation of QM that the observer causes the wave-function collapse. An 'observer' of course is consciousness.
PK (psychokenetic effect): Together with quantum entanglement goes quantum teleportation. How about moving an object- by teleportation- while looking at it?
Non- locality In both theories the phenomenon happens instantaneously but the subject (observer) becomes aware only when information arrives (not faster than the speed of light.)
Synchronistic phenomena can also take place in the future: In a similar way in QM, physical phenomena can be 'arranged' in the future through parallel worlds and according to the law of probabilities.
Holism: All theories seek for the 'philosophical stone', the ultimate unified explanation. How can this be done in modern science if we leave outside our souls?
Key words' explanations:
Meaningful coincidence: An instantaneous (non local) connection of a psychic state with one or more physical objects (or events) so that the objects can no longer be adequately described without full mention of the corresponding psychic content.
Quantum entanglement: An instantaneous (non local) connection of two or more physical (quantum-like) objects so that one object can no longer be adequately described without full mention of its counterpart—even if the individual objects are spatially separated.
The psyche and the 'Ψ' wave-function: The similarity is striking. I can clearly see no distinction if some kind of 'emotional' properties are included in the wave-function.
Archetypes: They are the 'standard' ways for the psyche to manifest its self in the same way that operators in QM 'contain' the values to be measured.
The observer effect: It is a well known interpretation of QM that the observer causes the wave-function collapse. An 'observer' of course is consciousness.
PK (psychokenetic effect): Together with quantum entanglement goes quantum teleportation. How about moving an object- by teleportation- while looking at it?
Non- locality In both theories the phenomenon happens instantaneously but the subject (observer) becomes aware only when information arrives (not faster than the speed of light.)
Synchronistic phenomena can also take place in the future: In a similar way in QM, physical phenomena can be 'arranged' in the future through parallel worlds and according to the law of probabilities.
Holism: All theories seek for the 'philosophical stone', the ultimate unified explanation. How can this be done in modern science if we leave outside our souls?
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment